Bridge Capacity Assessment through LRFR Method and Bridge Seismic Performance Evaluation Using the PBSD Concept: Case Study

Downloads
In this study, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted of the condition and performance of a concrete arch-type bridge located in close proximity to a fault. Utilizing the LRFR capacity assessment method and seismic performance analysis through the NLTHA process based on the PBSD concept, finite element modeling (FEM) was employed with a focus on construction stage analysis and model updating for calibration to site conditions. The assessment encompassed the determination of the rating factor for structural elements under service and ultimate limit state loading. Performance analysis under seismic loads includes an examination of engineering demand parameters such as concrete and reinforcement strains in columns, subjected to varying seismic hazard levels. Additional scrutiny involves assessing bearing displacement and overturning potential to identify potential damage before column failure. The primary objective of this research was to investigate pertinent and efficient techniques for evaluating bridge capacity and seismic performance. A thorough understanding of these methods is expected to facilitate the identification of suitable solutions to enhance the safety and reliability of bridges in Indonesia.
AASHTO, The Manual for Bridge Evaluation, 3rd Edition, AASHTO Publication, 2018.
Toutanji, H., Wang, D. & Vuddandam, R., Detailed Comparison between ASR/LFR and LRFR for Reinforced Concrete Highway Bridges, 6th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (IABMAS 2012), pp. 691-697, 2012. doi: 10.1201/b12352-93.
Estes, A.C. & Frangopol, D.M., Load Rating versus Reliability Analysis, Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(5), pp. 843-847, May. 2005. doi: 10.1061/ASCE0733-94452005131:5843.
Al-Khateeb, H.T., Shenton, H.W. & Chajes, M.J., Computing Continuous Load Rating Factors for Bridges Using Structural Health Monitoring Data, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 8(5), pp. 721-735, Nov. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s13349-018-0313-4.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2020, Proposed AASHTO Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Bridge Design, The National Academies Press, 2020. doi: 10.17226/25913.
Sudheer, G. & Choudhury, S., Performance-Based Seismic Design on Bridge Piers: A Review, Structural Integrity, 27, pp. 364-372, 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-04793-0_28.
Ozakgul, K., Yilmaz, M.F. & Caglayan, B.O., Assessment of an Old Reinforced Concrete Open-spandrel Arch Railway Bridge, Structures, 44, pp. 284-294, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.018.
National Earthquake Study Center, Map of Indonesian Earthquake Sources and Hazards, Ed. 1, Center for Housing and Settlement Research and Development, 2017. (Text in Indonesian)
Chen, X.H., Omenzetter, P. & Beskhyroun, S., Assessment of a Segmental Post-Tensioned Box Girder Bridge Using Ambient Vibration Testing, 23rd Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials (ACMSM23), pp. 1103-1108, 2014. doi: 10.13140/2.1.1608.8644.
National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, SNI 1725:2016 Loading for Bridges, National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, 2016. (Text in Indonesian)
AASHTO, LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition, AASHTO Publication, 2020.
Zhang, Q. & Alam, M.S., Performance-based Seismic Design of Bridges: A Global Perspective and Critical Review of Past, Present and Future Directions, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 15(4), pp. 539-554, 2019. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2018.1558269.
Simanjuntak, V.C., Imran, I., Moestopo, M. & Setio, H.D., The Evolution of Seismic Design Provisions in Indonesia’s National Bridge Code, Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 54(6), 220614, Nov. 2022. doi: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2022.54.6.14.
National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, SNI 1726:2019 Procedures for Earthquake Resistance Planning for Building and Non-Building Structures, National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, 2019. (Text in Indonesian)
National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, SNI 2833:2016 Bridge Planning Against Earthquake Loads, National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, 2016. (Text in Indonesian)
British Standards Institution, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 2, Bridges, BSI British Standards, 2005.
Hayden, C.P., Bray, J.D. & Abrahamson, N.A., Selection of Near-Fault Pulse Motions, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140(7), 04014030-1-04014030-14, 2014. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001129.
Chen, L. K., Zhang, N., Jiang, L. Z., Zeng, Z. P., Chen, G. W., and Guo, W., Near-fault Directivity Pulse-like Ground Motion Effect on High-speed Railway Bridge, J Cent South Univ, 21(6), pp. 2425-2436, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s11771-014-2196-9.
American Society of Civil Engineers, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017. doi: 10.1061/9780784414248.
Buckle, I., Friedland, I., Mander, J., Martin, G., Nutt, R. & Power, M., Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1-Bridges, Technical Report FHWA-HRT-06-032, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Georgetown Pike, Jan. 2006.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.