Flash Emissions from Acrylonitrile Storage Tank and Their Impact on Ambient Air Quality

acrylonitrile air dispersion ambient air quality flash emissions volatile organic compound

Authors

  • Pornpavit Mapraditkul Department of Sanitary Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Ratchawithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
  • Peemapat Jookjantra Department of Sanitary Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Ratchawithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
  • Pavaris Charuchitsopon Department of Sanitary Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Ratchawithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
  • Korn Premrungchet Department of Sanitary Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Ratchawithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
  • Sirapong Sooktawee Department of Climate Change and Environment, Climate Change and Environmental Research Center, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Rama VI Road, Bangkok 10400, , Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-0751
  • Sarawut Thepanondh
    sarawut.the@mahidol.ac.th
    Department of Sanitary Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Ratchawithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
December 2, 2025
January 15, 2026

Downloads

Flash emissions from chemical storage tanks are a major source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), accounting for over 90% of total VOC releases during storage. This study evaluated acrylonitrile emissions at a petrochemical facility using the Vasquez-Beggs Equation (VBE), TANKS 5.1, and the AERMOD dispersion model. Under midrange conditions, flashing losses were estimated at 12.84 g/s, with peak emissions reaching 18.17 g/s under high-pressure, low-temperature conditions. In comparison, breathing and working losses contributed only 0.0986 g/s and 0.2776 g/s, respectively, in uncontrolled scenarios. Air dispersion modeling indicated acrylonitrile concentrations exceeding 800 µg/m³ for 24-hour exposure and surpassing 250 µg/m³ in annual averages near sensitive receptors under uncontrolled conditions. Implementing a 90% efficient emission control system reduced flashing losses to 1.284 g/s, effectively lowering ambient concentrations by more than 80%. However, even with substantial reductions, residual cancer risks at certain receptors remained above the acceptable threshold of 1.0 × 10⁻⁶, highlighting the need for additional mitigation measures. These findings underscore the importance of advanced emission control technologies and optimized operational practices to minimize the environmental and health impacts of acrylonitrile storage tanks, offering actionable insights for sustainable industrial air quality management.