Multi-criteria Decision Making to Improve Displacement Amplification Ratio of an Amplifying Compliant Mechanism Flexure Hinge

Finite element method EAMR method SAW method WASPAS method EDAS method MEREC method Taguchi method Amplifier compliant mechanism flexure hinge

Authors

  • Ngoc Thai Huynh Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade, 140 Le Trong Tan, Tay Thanh Ward, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, , Viet Nam
  • Van Nam Huynh Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade, 140 Le Trong Tan, Tay Thanh Ward, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, , Viet Nam
  • Quoc Nhiem Tran Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade, 140 Le Trong Tan, Tay Thanh Ward, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, , Viet Nam
  • Chi Bao Phan Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade, 140 Le Trong Tan, Tay Thanh Ward, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, , Viet Nam
  • Minh Hung Vu Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, PetroVietnam University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, , Viet Nam
  • Trieu Khoa Nguyen
    nguyenkhoatrieu@iuh.edu.vn
    Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, 12 Nguyen Van Bao Street, Hanh Thong Ward, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Viet Nam https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2922-1512
  • Quoc Manh Nguyen Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Hung Yen University of Technology and Education, Hung Yen 160000, , Viet Nam https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0303-9886
September 15, 2025
November 5, 2025

Downloads

Multi-criteria decision-making methods including the Extended Additive Ratio Assessment (EAMR), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS), and Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) were employed in conjunction with the Taguchi method and finite element method (FEM) to optimize the displacement amplification of an amplifying compliant mechanism utilizing flexure joints. Initially, design variables for the compliant mechanism amplifier were selected. Minitab software was utilized to generate 27 experimental scenarios, and SolidWorks was employed to design 27 models of compliant mechanisms amplifier with flexure hinges. The stress and displacement of each design were estimated by FEM in ANSYS. The optimal mechanism was identified based on the largest displacement criterion as well as ensuring the smallest stress, as determined through the multi-criteria decision-making techniques and validated using the Taguchi method, variance analysis, and 3D surface plots. The predicted outcomes from the optimization methods are compared with FEM results for verification. For the EAMR method, the predicted and optimal values are 0.742046 and 0.74968, respectively. The SAW method yields values of 0.88684 (predicted) and 0.89210 (optimal), while the WASPAS method produces 0.8432 and 0.8481. The EDAS method results are 0.7978 (predicted) and 0.8187 (optimal). For displacement (Di), the predicted and optimal values are 0.65269 and 0.65238, respectively, and for stress (St), they are 49.3398 and 48.7950. In all methods, the deviation between predicted and optimal values remains under 3%. The resulting displacement amplification ratio (DAR) of the final mechanism is 65,237.