Author Guidelines Peer Review Reviewers Publication Ethics Article Processing Charge Statistics Notes on The Use of Generative AI
Authorship and Contributorship
Authorship and Contributorship
Principles for authorship, contributor recognition, author responsibilities, CRediT contributions, and the management of authorship changes and disputes.
Being named as an author of a JETS article is both a credit and a responsibility. It tells readers, employers and funders who created the work, and it tells them who will answer for it.
This page sets out who should be listed as an author, how other contributions should be recognised, and how JETS handles changes and disagreements about authorship.
Our approach follows the guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and adapts the authorship criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) to engineering research.
Who Qualifies as an Author
A person should be listed as an author only if they meet all four of the following conditions:
Made a substantial intellectual contribution to at least one of: the conception or design of the study; development of a method, model, device or experimental set-up; or collection, analysis or interpretation of the data.
Wrote part of the manuscript or revised it critically for its technical content.
Approved the final version submitted to JETS and any revised version.
Agrees to be accountable for the work, including helping to answer questions about the accuracy or integrity of any part of it.
Common Situations in Engineering Research
Contributions That Are Acknowledged Rather Than Authored
People and organisations whose help does not meet all four conditions should be thanked in the Acknowledgements section. Typical examples include:
The corresponding author must obtain permission from everyone named in the Acknowledgements.
Paid writing or editing services, and the source of any funding for them, must be disclosed.
Generative AI tools cannot be authors, because they cannot approve a manuscript or be held accountable for it.
Their use must be disclosed as described in the JETS policy on generative AI .
Authorship Practices That Are Not Accepted
JETS does not accept any of the following:
Describing Each Author's Contribution
Every research article must include an Author Contributions statement before the Acknowledgements.
JETS recommends CRediT terms, which are widely used and machine-readable.
A. Pratama: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft.
S. Wibowo: Software, Formal Analysis, Visualization.
R. Hidayat: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing, Funding Acquisition.
Authors who contributed equally may be marked as such with a footnote. The statement is published with the article.
Order of Authors
The authors decide the order of names together, before submission. JETS does not impose a convention, since the meaning of first, last and middle positions varies between fields and institutions.
The authors should be able to explain their chosen order if asked.
The Corresponding Author
One author acts as corresponding author on behalf of all the others. This person:
Names, Affiliations and Identifiers
Correct names and affiliations are essential for the article to be indexed and credited properly in Scopus and other databases.
Changes to the Author List
The author list submitted with the manuscript is expected to be final. Any request to add, remove or reorder authors after submission must:
The editor may put the manuscript on hold while a change request is being considered. After acceptance, changes are allowed only in exceptional circumstances and at the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief. After publication, any change requires a formal correction.
Group and Consortium Authorship
A research group or consortium may be named in the author list.
The manuscript must then state which individuals take responsibility for the work, and list the members of the group, either in the author list or in an appendix.
Only individuals who meet the authorship criteria are treated as authors for indexing purposes.
Authorship Disputes
Most disputes can be avoided if the research team agrees on authorship and author order at the start of a project, records that agreement, and revisits it when people join or leave or when roles change.
If a dispute arises before publication, the editors will ask the authors to resolve it among themselves or through their institutions, and will suspend processing until the authors confirm in writing that it has been resolved.
If a dispute or concern arises after publication, the editors will contact all the authors, may ask the institutions concerned to investigate, and will publish a correction, an expression of concern or, where misconduct is established, a retraction.
Shared Responsibility
By submitting a manuscript, all authors confirm that they have read it, that they stand behind its content, and that they have reasonable confidence in the contributions of their co-authors.
Each author is responsible for the parts of the work they carried out, and should be able to identify which co-author is responsible for each other part.
Authors should also follow the authorship policies of their own institutions and funders.
JETS may ask for further information about authorship or contributions at any stage.
Credit Author Statement
The Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences (JETS) requires authors to provide a CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) Author Statement to transparently describe each author's individual contributions to the research and preparation of the manuscript.
The 14 CRediT Roles
State the contribution of each author
The contribution of each author should be stated using the relevant CRediT roles. Multiple authors may share the same role, and each author may be assigned multiple roles according to their actual contributions.
CRediT Author Statement
For further information about the CRediT taxonomy, please refer to the official CRediT guidelines.
Credit Should Reflect Contribution and Responsibility
JETS expects authorship to reflect meaningful intellectual contribution, participation in the manuscript, approval of the final work, and shared responsibility for the integrity of the research.







