Utilization of Syngas as Co-firing Fuel for Carbonization of Arabica Coffee Pulp
Downloads
Pyrolysis is a commonly used method to produce main products such as bio-char, bio-oil and syngas. However, the practical use of syngas as a fuel is currently constrained by suboptimal properties and the necessity for specialized storage. This study investigated the impact of using syngas directly as an additional fuel for heating the pyrolysis reactor on process parameters and the properties of the resulting bio-char products. The experiment was conducted using two process variations: (i) pyrolysis utilizing syngas as fuel for co-firing with LPG, and (ii) pyrolysis using only LPG as fuel. The variables observed during the testing included the consumption of LPG fuel, process time, heating rate, pyrolysis product yields, and the properties of the bio-char. Characterization of the bio-char was carried out through proximate analysis, bomb calorimetry, thermogravimetric and FTIR analysis. Based on the experimental results it can be concluded that co-firing is able to save on the use of LPG and reduce process time. In terms of product yield, there was no significant difference when syngas was co-fired with LPG. In terms of the properties of the bio-char product, syngas co-firing pyrolysis helps in reducing the moisture content, increasing the fixed carbon content, and also increasing the calorific value up to 26855 J/g.
Basu P., Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction: Practical Design and Theory, ed.2, Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier, 2013.
Liu, Z., Yang, O., Cao, L, Li, S., Zeng, X., Zhou, W. & Zhang, C., Synthesis and Application of Porous Carbon Nanomaterials from Pomelo Peels: A Review, Molecules, 28(11), pp. 1-24, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/molecules28114429.
Mohammed, M.A.A., Salmiaton, A., Azlina, W.W., Amran, M.S.M., Fakhru’l-Razi, A. & Taufiq-Yap, Y.H., Hydrogen Rich Gas from Oil Palm Biomass as a Potential Source of Renewable Energy in Malaysia, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15(2), pp. 1258-1270, Feb. 2011.
Hanif, M.U, Zwawi, M., Capareda, S.C., Iqbal, H., Algarni, M., Felemban, B.F., Bahadar, A. & Waqaas, A., Product Distribution and Characteristics of Pyrolyzing Microalgae (Nannochloropsis oculata), Cotton Gin Trash, and Cattle Manure as a Cobiomass, Energies, 13, pp. 1-10, Feb. 2020.
International Coffee Organization, Coffee Report and Outlook, Int. Coffee Organ., 32, December 2023.
BPS – Statistic Indonesia, Indonesian Coffee Statistics 2021. BPS – Statistic Indonesia, Jakarta, Nov. 2022.
Chala, B., Oechsner, H., Latif, S. & Muller, S., Biogas Potential of Coffee Processing Waste in Ethiopia, 10 (2678) pp. 1-14, July 2018. doi: 10.3390/su10082678.
Setiawan, A., Zakarya, M., Alchalil & Nur, T.B., Experimental Investigation and Simulation of Slow Pyrolysis Process of Arabica Coffee Agroindustry Residues in a Pilot-Scale Reactor, J. Ecol. Eng., 23(8), pp. 260–269, July 2022. doi: 10.12911/22998993/150693.
Zulnazri, Putri, A.P., Dewi, R., Bahri, S. & Sulhatun, Characterization of Glucose as a Raw Material for Bioethanol Produced from α–Cellulose Based on Arabica Coffee Pulp Waste, J. Teknol. Kim. Unimal, 2, pp. 102-111, May 2022.
Setiawan, A., Hayat, F., Faisal & Nur, T.B., Combustion Characteristics of Densified Bio-char Produced from Gayo Arabica Coffee-pulp: Effect of Binder, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 364(1), 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/364/1/012007.
Fernández F.J., Llano, T., Kochaniec, M.K. & Coz, A., Slow Pyrolysis of Specialty Coffee Residues towards the Circular Economy in Rural Areas, Energies, 16(5), pp. 1-21, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16052300.
Nooman, M.A., Asaad S.M., Rocha, M.L., Inayat, A., Said, Z., Assad, M.E.H. & Elgendi, M., Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering Case Report A Case Study on Bio-oil Extraction from Spent Coffee Grounds using Fast Pyrolysis in a Fluidized Bed Reactor, Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng., 8, 100529, Oct. 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100529.
Setiawan, A., Randa, A.G., Faisal, Nur, T.B. & Rusdianasari, Thermal Decomposition of Gayo Arabica Coffee-Pulp in a Segmented Chamber, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1500/1/012076.
Directorate General of Oil and Gas Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Statistic Oil and Gas Semester 2022, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Jakarta, pp. 62-70, 2022.
Jahirul, M.I., Rasul, M.G., Chowdhury, A.A. & Ashwath, N., Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis—A Technological Review, Energies, 5 (12), pp. 4952-5001, Nov. 2012.
Aller, D., Bakshi, S. & Laird, D.A., Modified Method for Proximate Analysis of Biochars, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 124, pp. 335-342, Jan. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.01.012.
Tripathi, M., Sahu, J.N. & Ganesan, P., Effect of Process Parameters on Production of Biochar from Biomass Waste through Pyrolysis: A Review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 55, pp. 467-481, Mar. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.122.
Pranoto, P., Nugrahaningtyas, K.D. & Putri, R.N.O., Study of Final Temperature and Heating Rate Variation to Pyrolysis of Acacia (Acacia mangium W.) wood waste, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 959(1), 2020. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/959/1/012012.
Wickramaarachchi, W. & Narayana, M., Pyrolysis of Single Biomass Particle using Three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling, Renew. Energy, 146, pp. 1153-1165, Feb. 2020.
Williams, P.T. & Besler, S., The Influence of Temperature and Heating Rate on the Slow Pyrolysis of Biomass, Renew. energy, 7(3), pp. 233-250, Mar. 1996.
Qureshi, K.M., Lup, A.N.K. Khan, S., Abnisa, F. & Daud, W.M.A.W., Optimization of Palm Shell Pyrolysis Parameters in Helical Screw Fluidized Bed Reactor: Effect of Particle Size, Pyrolysis Time and Vapor Residence Time, Clean. Eng. Technol., 4, 100174, Oct. 2021.
Maulinda, L., Husin, H., Rahman, N.A., Rosnelly, C.M., Nasution, F., Abidin, N.Z., Faisal, Yani, F.T. & Ahmadi, Effects of Temperature and Times on the Product Distribution of Bio-oils Derived from Typha latifolia Pyrolysis as Renewable Energy, Results Eng., 18, 101163, Jun. 2023.
Zhang, S., Hu, H., Jia, X., Chen, J., Cheng, C., Jia, X., Wu, Z. & Zhu, L., How Biochar Derived from Pond Cypress (Taxodium Ascendens) Evolved with Pyrolysis Temperature and Time and Their End Efficacy Evaluation, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19 (18), Sept. 2022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811205.
Mabuda, A.I., Mamphweli, N.S. & Meyer, E.L., Model Free Kinetic Analysis of Biomass/Sorbent Blends for Gasification Purposes, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 53, pp. 1656-1664, Jan. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.038.
Hussein, O.H. &. Provis, Effect of Testing Condition on the Loss on Ignition Results of Anhydrous Granulated Blast Furnace Slags Determined via Thermogravimetry, Conference segment on Concrete with Supplementary Cementitious Materials, pp. 299-307, 2016.
Fraga, L.G., Teixeira, S. & Soares, D., Behavior and Kinetics of Pine Wood Particles Using Thermogravimetric Analysis, Energies, 13(2756), pp. 1-22, Jun. 2020.
Fu, S., Chen, H., Yang, J. & Yang, Z., Kinetics of thermal pyrolysis of Eucalyptus bark by using thermogravimetric-Fourier transform infrared spectrometry technique, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 139(6), pp. 3527-3535, Sept. 2019. doi: 10.1007/s10973-019-08763-y.
Nurmalita, N., Raihan, R., Jalil, Z., Nur, S. & Setiawan, A., The Physical and Chemical Properties of Activated Nanocarbon Produced from Robusta (Coffea Canephora) Coffee Pulp under Slow Pyrolysis Method, Coffee Sci., 17, pp. Dec. 2022. doi: 10.25186/.v17i.2019.
Herak, D., Biomass for Energy Application, ed. 1, Energies , 2021.
Milena, C. & Cruz, A., Physicochemical , Microbiological , and Sensory Characterization of Fermented Coffee Pulp Beverages, Coffee Sci., 16, pp. 6-9, Jun. 2021. doi: 10.25186/.v16i.1889.
Chaplin, M., Water Absorption Spectrum, The Lancet, 265, pp. 393-394, Jul. 2017.
Craig, A.P., Franca, A.S. & Oliveira, V., Evaluation of the Potential of FTIR and Chemometrics for Separation between Defective and Non-defective Coffees, Food Chem., 132(3), pp. 1368-1374, Jun. 2012.
Belchior, V., Botelho, B.G., Casal, S., Oliveira, L.S. & Franca, A.S., FTIR and Chemometrics as Effective Tools in Predicting the Quality of Specialty Coffees, Food Anal. Methods, 13(1), pp. 275-283, Jan. 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12161-019-01619-z.
Ribeiro, J.S., Ferreira, M.M.C. & Salva, T.J.G., Talanta Chemometric Models for the Quantitative Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Arabica coffee beverages using near infrared spectroscopy, Talanta, 83(5), pp. 1352-1358, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.001.
Craig, A.P., Franca, A.S. & Oliveira, L.S., Discrimination between Defective and Non-defective Roasted Coffees by Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy, Lwt, 47(2), pp. 505-511, Jul. 2012.
Barrios-Rodríguez, Y., Collazos-Escobar, G.A. & Gutiérrez, G.N., ATR-FTIR for Characterizing and Differentiating Dried and Ground Coffee Cherry Pulp of Different Varieties (Coffea Arabica L.), Eng. Agric., 41(1), pp. 70-77, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n1p70-77/2021.
Tessmer, C.H., Vidic, R.D. & Uranowski, L.J., Impact of Oxygen-Containing Surface Functional Groups on Activated Carbon Adsorption of Phenols, 31, pp. 1872-1878, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1021/es960474r.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.